Решил, что к "жизни" это больше подходит..
Бывший редактор Вашингтонского комПоста о т.наз. "объективности" и её расистско-мизогино-гомо/транс/климатофобной сущности:
https://web.archive.org/web/20230130145 ... diversity/former executive editor of The Washington comPost писал(а): “Objectivity” is defined by most dictionaries as expressing or using facts without distortion by personal beliefs, bias, feelings or prejudice. Journalistic objectivity has been generally understood to mean much the same thing.
But increasingly, reporters, editors and media critics argue that the concept of journalistic objectivity is a distortion of reality. They point out that the standard was dictated over decades by male editors in predominantly White newsrooms and reinforced their own view of the world. They believe that pursuing objectivity can lead to false balance or misleading “bothsidesism” in covering stories about race, the treatment of women, LGBTQ+ rights, income inequality, climate change and many other subjects. And, in today’s diversifying newsrooms, they feel it negates many of their own identities, life experiences and cultural contexts, keeping them from pursuing truth in their work.
[...]
...truth-seeking news media must move beyond whatever “objectivity” once meant to produce more trustworthy news.
[...]
More and more journalists of color and younger White reporters, including LGBTQ+ people, in increasingly diverse newsrooms believe that the concept of objectivity has prevented truly accurate reporting informed by their own backgrounds, experiences and points of view.
